High There

SUBSCRIBE

Image via Dupe/Celena Riley

The Original Grower: OG Kush

Stephanie Valente

By Stephanie Valente

August 31, 2026

Ask ten people what

is named for and you’ll get multiple different answers.

Ocean Grown, for California. Original Gangster, from the hip-hop usage that carried the phrase into general speech. Or Original Grower, for the person who actually made it.

This is the most globally recognized strain name on earth. It’s the genetic backbone of a huge share of what’s on a dispensary menu this afternoon. And nobody can tell you what the letters mean.

So, how does cannabis culture handle credit? Let’s time travel back to the 1990s first and take a look.

1996, one surviving cutting

The version most cultivators agree on goes something like this.

In Florida, a grower named

had a prized cut of flower he’d renamed after himself — Bubba (yes, really) — and access to a local strain that a friend described as looking like “Kushberries,” a nod to Afghanistan’s Hindu Kush that had nothing to do with where the plant came from. That offhand comment is where the word Kush enters American cannabis vocabulary.

In 1996, Berger told a Los Angeles grower named Josh Del Rosso that Florida flower beat anything in California. Del Rosso told him to prove it. Berger got on a plane with cuttings in his pockets during the height of the drug war.

Almost all of the cuttings died. One didn’t.

That single surviving cutting became the clone-only OG Kush that rewired Southern California. Del Rosso — Josh D — distributed it through a close circle. B-Real eventually got the cut, by most accounts through Wonderbrett’s founder. Crossing Bubba to the OG produced Bubba Kush. Within a decade, OG genetics were the foundation of the West Coast market and outdoor pounds were fetching prices nobody had seen for sun-grown flower.

Now let’s circle back to the two names, Berger and Del Rosso. Ask a hundred people in a dispensary and you might find one who knows either.

Josh D himself has been almost aggressively modest about it, describing the phenomenon as a matter of the plant rather than of him. That humility is admirable and it’s also, in a way, the problem.

The Cookies chapter

Same shape, one generation later.

In San Francisco, a grower named Jai Chang had been cultivating since the late nineties and was working with a Durban Poison line he’d developed himself. Crossing that to an

cut produced what became Girl Scout Cookies, the strain that spawned an entire family: Sunset Sherbet, Gelato, Cherry Pie, and a decade and a half of dominance.

Berner named it. Berner put it in music videos, too, plus wore the merch as he built a brand and then a national company on it.

To be fair to Berner, he came up in this world rather than into it and he’s credited as a Cookie Fam member. Berner is a part of the breeding collective and the marketing genuinely was the thing that took a Bay Area strain global. That’s real work.

But there’s a reason casual coverage of this strain routinely gets the two men confused since we found sources that flatly identify Chang as Berner. The collective has kept the specifics of who bred what in-house, and the lineage itself is contested even now. When there’s no record, the name that sticks is the name attached to the loudest signal.

Khalifa Kush, and the pattern

The same structure again. Khalifa Kush was bred as an OG Kush phenotype specifically for Wiz Khalifa’s personal taste. He kept it as private stash for years before it ever reached a shelf in 2016, which is exactly why it’s outlasted so many launches. Essentially, it was a real thing before it was a product.

Somebody bred it for him. That person’s name is not on the jar and for most consumers it isn’t anywhere they’d find it.

Once you see this pattern you can’t stop seeing it. The durable brands in this industry are almost all built on a cultivator’s work, with a famous person supplying the distribution. Your Culture-House-style origin story — an artist hires someone to grow for them personally, and it turns into a company — is the standard architecture instead of just a quirky-one-off.

Why the credit vanished

The obvious answer is prohibition, and the obvious answer is right. Stick with us here.

For fifty years, this was work you could not sign. You couldn’t publish a paper, file a patent, register a trademark, or put your name on a package. There wasn’t necessarily a real deal paper trail, so to speak. Every mechanism a culture normally uses to assign credit was unavailable, and using one could put you in prison. Anonymity became a form of survival.

So attribution became oral history, passed grower to grower with the cuttings. Oral history is durable, but it’s also lossy, and it rewards whoever tells the story most often to the most people.

But, the growers wrote the language everybody now uses. Strain names as identity. Flavor and aroma mattering more than a potency number. Menus organized by experience rather than by weight. That vocabulary came out of gardens, not marketing departments. Hip-hop amplified it enormously and that’s not a small contribution because it’s how the words reached the rest of us. Though it amplified something cultivators had already built.

Legalization gave this industry brands, packaging, compliance labels and QR codes. It did not give it an attribution system. You can now find out which licensed operator produced your flower. You still generally cannot find out who bred it.

What to do with this information

Next time something is genuinely excellent, ask the budtender who bred it. Most of the time nobody will know and that’s the point. However shops with real relationships to their cultivators sometimes do, and asking is how a norm starts.

And when you see a name on a jar, hold both things at once. The distribution was real work. So was the plant. And the person who cultivated it. They’re just very rarely the same person, and only one of them gets the packaging.

Stephanie Valente

About The Author

Stephanie Valente

HIGH THERE MISSION

WE’RE A CREATIVE COMMUNITY — EXPLORING THE SCIENCE, CRAFT, AND CULTURE OF CANNABIS.
WE BELIEVE THAT WE HAVE A COLLECTIVE RESPONSIBILITY TOWARDS ERADICATING THE STIGMA, MISINFORMATION, AND INEQUITIES SURROUNDING THIS PLANT, SO WE CAN UNLOCK ITS TRUE POTENTIAL FOR ALL.